Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Almost 24hrs later, WBFS cloning's complete...

  1. #11
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    Could do that in about 2 hours with USB 3.0, but the reason for that transfer is the iomega drive.. It takes about 6 hours to clone my Hitachi to a Seagate drive (200 iso) but it takes about 24 hours to transfer the same iso's from the Hitachi drive to the iomega drive.. Had to do this about 3 times.

    Bigjdoberman

  2. #12
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Hey guys ive figured out how you can do faster transfers for Usb Drives. Here are some simple steps you might want to consider doing:

    1. The first tip and most important is to STOP USING "WBFS MANAGER". There are way better ones out there that transfer at faster rates, the one I use and recommend is called "Wii Backup Manager". This program tells you the rate or how many MB/s you are trasnfering at and how long the transfers will take.

    2. Second Important factor is to NOT do transfers using USB connection. If you can, open up the harddrive enclosure and connect the raw harddrive straight to your motherboard. In order for this to work though your motherboard must accept sata connections and not IDE. If your computer is fairly new then you should have sata connection. Look it up on google if you dont know what a sata harddrive looks like compared to a IDE harddrive.

    3. Third is to format the drive you are using to fat32 using "Wii Backup Manager" and transfer "WBFS" files instead of the usual "iso" files. So in other words if you are transfering iso's to another harddrive, instead convert those to WBFS files since WBFS transfers are way faster. Just make sure the program you are using like Wiiflow and USB Loader GX can read WBFS files. I use Wiiflow_222 Version. Wiiflow_249 doesnt work.

    4. Also consider upgrading your computer specs, I personally bought a computer with a dual processor and 2 gigs of ram and most importantly that it had SATA connection, and with just that alone my transfer speeds went up from 24MB/s to 60MB/s . So that means that now I can fill up a 1.5 Terrabyte in just 5 hours TOPS, instead of the usual 24 hours.

    5. Another tip I can give u is to use Windows 7 since supposedly data transfers are faster on Windows 7 then on XP. I havent tested that yet but Im using Windows 7.

    6. My final tip, remember to make your computer not sleep after a while of being turned on, if you want, change the settings so that the screen turns off after maybe 10 minutes but whatever you do, dont let it go to sleep because then your data transfers will pause or stop.

    I hope this helps you guys and if you have any questions or more tips, please send me a message here @ wiihacks because posting my email addy is a bad idea.or just respond to this thread.
    Last edited by israelgaribaldi; 05-01-2011 at 10:30 PM. Reason: removed email address

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    WiiHacks Staff
    Forum Administrator
    Only Site Donators Can PM Staff
    nightstah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Repatriated to WH
    Posts
    18,503
    Thanks
    1,859
    Thanked 4,333 Times in 3,634 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5
    1. So other than a progress bar and a supposed mb/sec progress xfer graph, your conclusion would be based on real world testing --- or merely bells and whistles that don't mean squat for performance or results?

    2. Yes, because every single internal USB drive is secretly SATA (serial ATA) without exception --- thanks for the over-simplification and avoidance of real world.

    3. So don't use WBFS to transfer the data, but take extra time and convert to WBFS formatted files/images because 'they transfer way faster." The logic of that statement escapes me, sorry.

    4. Increased system memory may indeed help; the bottleneck is both the interface of choice, RPM, and other accompanying limitations or parameters. Also shorter files tend to transfer at different speeds than larger files.

    5. Again, you mention something that even yourself admit to not trying. Hey, the world's square --- I really don't know that, but I've heard that. Don't fall off the edge, OK?

    6. Sigh; usually disc activity itself prevents a system from entering full sleep mode.

    Special bonus fail for "email me back" questions. While I realize you're making an attempt to help or offer advice or guidance, the quality of material you offer is somewhat suspect.

  4. #14
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Sorry for my ignorance, please forgive me.

    Quote Originally Posted by nightstah View Post
    1. So other than a progress bar and a supposed mb/sec progress xfer graph, your conclusion would be based on real world testing --- or merely bells and whistles that don't mean squat for performance or results?

    2. Yes, because every single internal USB drive is secretly SATA (serial ATA) without exception --- thanks for the over-simplification and avoidance of real world.

    3. So don't use WBFS to transfer the data, but take extra time and convert to WBFS formatted files/images because 'they transfer way faster." The logic of that statement escapes me, sorry.

    4. Increased system memory may indeed help; the bottleneck is both the interface of choice, RPM, and other accompanying limitations or parameters. Also shorter files tend to transfer at different speeds than larger files.

    5. Again, you mention something that even yourself admit to not trying. Hey, the world's square --- I really don't know that, but I've heard that. Don't fall off the edge, OK?

    6. Sigh; usually disc activity itself prevents a system from entering full sleep mode.

    Special bonus fail for "email me back" questions. While I realize you're making an attempt to help or offer advice or guidance, the quality of material you offer is somewhat suspect.

    Wow. Seriously dude sorry for the bad information I wrote. I promise It wont happen again. Please tell us, what should we do since your so smart.
    Dude seriously, I really didnt get any of your points. Infact It looks to me like you where more interested in trying to correct somebody and showing the world how smart you where then to actually try to help with some actual useful information. I was about to try to respond to every thing you said but Its just that you disagreed to EVERYTHING. ...Really?? Wow.
    Ill try to address Step 3, hopefully I wont insult you with my ignorance. Yes I realize converting and transfering just one time would be kind of dumb to. Thank you for pointing that out. But what I meant was that its better to take the time to convert the files first to wbfs so that your TRANSFER"S"<(take note of this last letter here) will be faster "IN THE FUTURE". As in, if you do a lot of transfers. As in if you do more than 1 or 2 or 5 transfers in a month. Thats why If you read in the beggining, it says "transfers"(plural) in pretty much every sentence I use. Thats what I meant. If you wherent so busy being really really really ridiculously smart, you would of picked up on that.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Retired WiiHacks Staff
    narse1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Southern Fairy Land
    Posts
    7,489
    Thanks
    826
    Thanked 1,775 Times in 1,371 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by israelgaribaldi View Post
    Wow. Seriously dude sorry for the bad information I wrote. I promise It wont happen again. Please tell us, what should we do since your so smart.
    Dude seriously, I really didnt get any of your points. Infact It looks to me like you where more interested in trying to correct somebody and showing the world how smart you where then to actually try to help with some actual useful information. I was about to try to respond to every thing you said but Its just that you disagreed to EVERYTHING. ...Really?? Wow.
    Ill try to address Step 3, hopefully I wont insult you with my ignorance. Yes I realize converting and transfering just one time would be kind of dumb to. Thank you for pointing that out. But what I meant was that its better to take the time to convert the files first to wbfs so that your TRANSFER"S"<(take note of this last letter here) will be faster "IN THE FUTURE". As in, if you do a lot of transfers. As in if you do more than 1 or 2 or 5 transfers in a month. Thats why If you read in the beggining, it says "transfers"(plural) in pretty much every sentence I use. Thats what I meant. If you wherent so busy being really really really ridiculously smart, you would of picked up on that.
    And most of the points you have made are either covered on the forum already or people know.

    Come off it you said use a higher spec on your pc - Don't most people know if you upgrade your spec then you pc will run faster meaning things will process faster - Its like most people would know if you put a ferrari engine in a skoda the thing will go faster.

    Most of us suggest using a fat32 hdd and wbfs files because a wbfs partition is a waste of useful space.

    Oh I forgot to say that you are bringing to life a thread that went dead at this date and time ---> 12-15-2010 02:16 PM


    Last edited by narse1979; 05-02-2011 at 02:11 AM.


  6. 1 User Says Thank You narse1979 For This Useful Post


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •